IRC vs ERC in Vietnam: A Foreign Investor’s 2026 Registration Roadmap
Key takeaways
- Treat the IRC as the project-facing record and the ERC as the enterprise-facing record. They are complementary, not interchangeable.1 10
- Article 19(2) of the 2025 Law on Investment allows an economic organisation to be established before IRC procedures, but only subject to foreign-investor market-access conditions.1
- An ERC-first sequence is not a blanket approval to operate. Project, location, policy, market-access and sectoral conditions may still determine what can happen next.1 2 10
- Use exact activity, investor, ownership, location and funding facts to select a route. Avoid nominee arrangements and keep enterprise information accurate.4 6 7
- Coordinate registration with the current bank and foreign-exchange process. Circular 38/2026/TT-NHNN requires relevant subjects to provide updated IRC/ERC documents to the licensed bank where investment capital accounts are opened.9
Direct answer: An IRC and an ERC serve different functions. The IRC records an investment project, while the ERC establishes an enterprise’s legal identity and core registration particulars. Since 1 March 2026, a foreign investor may establish an economic organisation before IRC procedures, subject to market-access conditions. That flexibility does not remove an IRC where the project is in the statutory IRC-required category or permit premature project implementation.1 10
The short answer: IRC and ERC do different legal work
The clearest way to approach IRC vs ERC Vietnam is to separate the project from the company. Vietnam’s current investment framework describes investment through several forms, including establishing an economic organisation and implementing an investment project. An IRC belongs to the project layer. An ERC belongs to the enterprise-registration layer. A foreign investor may need to manage both layers even when the paperwork is planned as one transaction.1 3 5
What an IRC is designed to record
An Investment Registration Certificate is the project-facing record. In practical terms, the official Ho Chi Minh City Investment and Trade Promotion Centre explains that an IRC captures characteristics such as the project objective, scale, location, total investment capital, implementation schedule and operating term. Those facts are not administrative decoration. They are the facts against which a project can be screened for market access, location, planning, investment-policy and sectoral requirements. The controlling legal text is the Vietnamese Law on Investment and its implementing rules, so the precise result should be checked against the project’s actual activity and place of implementation.1 2 10
Article 26 of Law No. 143/2025/QH15 identifies foreign-investor investment projects among the projects subject to IRC procedures. The provision also sets out exclusions, so it should not be converted into the shortcut statement that every foreign commercial step requires the same certificate. A foreign investor considering a new project, an acquisition or a further investment should identify the transaction type before assuming that a prior filing pattern applies.1 2
What an ERC is designed to record
An Enterprise Registration Certificate establishes the company’s registered legal identity. The ITPC description identifies familiar enterprise particulars, including the name, registered address, legal representative and charter capital. The Law on Enterprises and the enterprise-registration decrees provide the corporate framework around that identity. The ERC is therefore central to forming and administering the company, but it does not itself determine whether a planned foreign-invested project is permitted, whether a conditional business line has been satisfied or whether an investment-policy decision is required.3 4 5 10
This distinction matters because “company registered” and “project cleared” are not the same status. A certificate can be valid for its own legal job while another project or operating condition remains outstanding. Clear internal language helps: call the IRC the project record, call the ERC the enterprise record, and record any separate sectoral permission in its own workstream. That framing reduces the risk of treating a corporate filing result as a complete market-entry conclusion.1 2 10

Figure 2. Side-by-side comparison of the IRC and ERC. Original VietPard editorial visual created from cited sources. 1 2 10 Alt text: Original comparison chart showing the distinct planning functions of Vietnam’s Investment Registration Certificate and Enterprise Registration Certificate.
What changed in 2026: sequencing flexibility, not a free pass
The 2026 change is important, but its boundary is equally important. Law No. 143/2025/QH15 took effect on 1 March 2026. Article 19(2) provides that a foreign investor may establish an economic organisation to implement an investment project before carrying out procedures to grant or adjust an IRC, while requiring compliance with the foreign-investor market-access conditions in Article 8 when establishing that organisation. This is a sequencing option. It is not a statement that investment review has disappeared.1
Article 8 starts from national treatment for foreign investors but makes a material exception for activities on the Government’s published list of sectors with restricted foreign-investor market access. Conditions can concern matters such as foreign ownership percentage, investment form, scope of activity, investor or partner capacity, and other legal or treaty conditions. Decree No. 96/2026/ND-CP, effective 31 March 2026, is the current implementing decree to consult alongside the relevant sectoral rules. An investor should not infer a result from a broad English label for an industry or from an old market-entry article.1 2
The practical interpretation from ITPC is useful: company-first may give a legal presence for properly scoped preparatory matters, but it does not formalise implementation of an IRC-required project before the IRC is obtained. The same source flags the risk of tax, reporting, contract and unwinding consequences if an entity is formed and the project is later not approved. That is an operational warning, not a prediction that this outcome will occur. Its value is to make investors price the downside of an early entity rather than viewing ERC-first as automatically faster or safer.10
For that reason, the question is not simply “IRC or ERC first?” The better question is “Which legal work must be completed before the business commits to this location, contract, funding step or launch activity?” A project with land, planning, restricted-access, conditional-business or policy-approval exposure normally deserves early project screening. A project with a clear need for a preliminary entity may still need a carefully delimited ERC-first plan. Each route should be confirmed against current authority practice.1 2 10

Figure 3. A decision flow for assessing IRC-first or ERC-first sequencing. Original VietPard editorial visual created from cited sources. 1 2 10 Alt text: Original decision flow prompting foreign investors to assess regulatory exposure before choosing a registration sequence.
Decision aid: compare the legal job before choosing the order
The useful comparison is functional. The IRC concerns an investment project; the ERC concerns the enterprise that may implement it. The two records intersect, but neither replaces a sectoral licence, a market-access assessment or an investment-policy decision where those are required.1 2 10
| Decision question | IRC lens | ERC lens |
|---|---|---|
| What is being registered? | The project and its stated characteristics. | The enterprise and its core registered identity. |
| What must be tested first? | Project category, location, market access and any policy or sector condition. | Enterprise form, name, address, legal representative, capital and ownership information. |
| Does the document alone permit launch? | No. Applicable project, market-access and sectoral conditions still govern implementation. | No. Entity registration is not clearance to implement an IRC-required project. |
| Who should own the workstream? | Investment lead with regulatory, location and sector input. | Corporate-registration lead with reliable investor and beneficial-owner data. |
Table 1. Working comparison for planning only. Confirm the statutory route for the specific activity and location. 1 2 10
Build the registration roadmap around the facts that change it
A reliable roadmap is evidence-led. Start by expressing the intended activity in operational terms: what will be sold or delivered, who contracts with customers, where revenue is generated, whether the company will import, manufacture, distribute, advise, develop, operate a platform or employ staff, and which activities are only internal support. This description should then be mapped to proposed Vietnamese business activities and checked against the current restricted-market-access list, relevant treaty commitments where applicable, and sector rules. The legal result depends on the exact activity, not on a generic label such as “technology”, “trading” or “services”.1 2
Step 1: establish the investor and ownership record
Identify the investor, the intended enterprise form, the ownership chain and the person or persons who ultimately control or benefit from the arrangement. This is now more than a due-diligence preference. Law No. 76/2025/QH15 introduced beneficial-owner information into the enterprise-law framework, while the 2026 enterprise-registration amendments reinforce responsibility for lawful, truthful and accurate filing information. The Government’s published explanation of Decree No. 296/2026/ND-CP also states that owners, members and shareholders must not hold capital in another person’s name.4 6 7
The practical standard is simple: do not use a local nominee as a paperwork fix. A proposed structure may require commercial, investment, governance and beneficial-owner analysis, especially where foreign access is restricted or a local partner is proposed. The article cannot decide whether a specific shareholder is a beneficial owner or whether a proposed arrangement complies. It can, however, flag that the ownership evidence should be consistent across the investment, enterprise, bank and internal corporate records.4 6 7 11
Step 2: identify project and location exposure
Next, put the location into the project plan rather than leaving it for after incorporation. Article 27 of the Law on Investment allocates investment-registration authority by the place of implementation, including a distinction for projects in industrial parks, export-processing zones, high-tech zones and economic zones. A proposed site can therefore affect the authority, project evidence and other approvals that must be considered. Land, planning, environmental, technology or local licensing questions can also be relevant depending on the activity.1 2
Step 3: decide what can be preparatory and what must wait
Set out the first six to twelve months of actions and classify each as due diligence, entity formation, project implementation, operational licensing, banking, tax, recruitment or contracting. The aim is not to create artificial labels. It is to avoid committing the future company to a project step that presupposes approvals it does not yet have. For an ERC-first plan, document why the company needs to exist early and which actions are held pending the investment and sectoral work. For an IRC-led plan, make the project review the critical path and avoid spending decisions that assume the answer.1 2 10
Decision aid: five questions to settle before an application is sequenced
A well-prepared route begins with a short internal fact sheet. This does not replace a legal or authority review. It does prevent a company form, business description or funding plan from being selected before the project facts are known.1 2 6 7
| Question to answer | Evidence or working output | Why it changes the route |
|---|---|---|
| What exactly will be offered? | Plain-English description, proposed Vietnamese activity codes and revenue model. | Exact activities drive market-access and sectoral checks. |
| Who is the investor and ultimate owner? | Investor documents, ownership chain and beneficial-owner information, where applicable. | Supports accurate filing and avoids nominee arrangements. |
| Where will the project operate? | Proposed province, site or zone and any property or planning constraints. | Competent authority and project issues can vary by location. |
| What needs to happen before launch? | Lease, hiring, contracts, equipment, licences, tax and bank workstreams. | Separates preparatory tasks from project implementation. |
| How will funds move and be evidenced? | Capital plan, remittance narrative and current licensed-bank requirements. | Foreign-exchange controls and bank document checks are operationally material. |
Table 2. Registration-readiness checklist. It is an editorial planning aid, not a prescribed government dossier. 1 2 6 7 9
Use the enterprise registration process carefully and keep information consistent
Enterprise registration is now more digitally structured, but digital access does not eliminate the need for a correct dossier. Decree No. 168/2025/ND-CP governs enterprise registration as amended by Decree No. 296/2026/ND-CP. The Government’s July 2026 explanation describes electronic filing through the National Business Registration System after login via the National Public Service Portal or National Identification Application. It also explains that documents required in the dossier must be appropriately signed and uploaded in electronic form, and that the filer receives an electronic receipt and appointment after submission.5 6 7
The same explanation says that provincial business-registration authorities can draw on connected state databases rather than asking applicants to resubmit certain information already available, but they may request documents where the data cannot be obtained or are incomplete or inaccurate. That is a reason to treat portal filing as a controlled process, not a reason to assume every foreign investor can complete every step remotely or without document preparation. The National Business Registration Portal is the official operational reference point for the system and registration information services.6 7 8
Consistency is the practical discipline. The investor identity, ownership structure, enterprise particulars, project narrative, capital figures and addresses should be reconciled before each submission. A later change can create separate amendment work. Conversely, a premature decision to use vague business lines or an untested address can create avoidable clarification cycles. This is not a promise about review times. It is a control principle: give each authority and business partner the same supportable facts, then update them when a material change is actually approved or registered.1 5 6
After the certificate: treat banking and operating permissions as separate gates
An ERC or IRC is a milestone, not an operating checklist. The company may still need to establish tax, accounting, employment, premises, sectoral licensing, capital and bank workstreams. The order is fact-dependent. A business should confirm which activities can lawfully start at each point and assign an owner for each open condition. This is especially important where the proposed line is conditional, where a regulated site is involved, or where a contract would commit the new entity before approvals are in place.1 2 10
Foreign-exchange implementation also deserves its own current-law check. Circular No. 38/2026/TT-NHNN took effect on 18 August 2026 and covers, among other things, the opening and use of foreign-currency and VND investment capital accounts, capital contribution and investment-related transfers. Article 15 requires investors and relevant subjects to declare transaction content truthfully and fully, clearly state transfer purposes and provide documents requested by licensed banks. It also requires relevant subjects to supplement granted or amended IRC/ERC documents to the licensed bank where their investment capital accounts are opened.9
This should not be turned into a universal bank-document list or a claim that any account can be opened in a particular sequence. Banks apply customer due diligence and may request information under their own procedures. Before funds move, obtain the current requirements from the selected licensed bank and align the remittance narrative, account arrangement and certificate status. Using the current term “investment capital account” is more accurate than relying on older market language that may no longer match the current circular.9

Figure 4. Registration hands off to controlled operational setup. Original VietPard editorial visual created from cited sources. 6 7 9 Alt text: Original timeline showing banking, operating permissions and governance work that follow the certificates.
What this means for a foreign founder or regional expansion lead
The practical action is to appoint one internal owner for the “single source of truth” before asking for a filing sequence. That person should collect the commercial activity description, investor documents, beneficial-owner information, proposed company form, ownership split, capital plan, target location and first operating milestones. The investor can then ask focused questions: Is the activity subject to foreign-investor conditions? Is an IRC required for the project? Does an investment-policy, site or sector review sit before the next commercial commitment? Which authority is competent for the intended location? What is the minimum safe scope of any preparatory activity?1 2 4 6
For a regional team, the choice is often about risk allocation rather than speed. An IRC-led route may reveal a difficult project issue before an entity has tax, administration, contracts and employment obligations. An ERC-first route may be worth assessing where a genuine preparatory company need exists and the project risk is understood. Neither route should be selected by a template. Record the assumptions, the condition owners and the “do not start yet” activities in a short board or investment memo.1 10
A finance lead should be involved before the filing sequence is finalised, not only after incorporation. Capital, currency, bank onboarding, accounting setup and contract timing may depend on documents that are produced or amended during registration. A human-resources lead should similarly understand whether an early entity is intended to hire, who the employer will be and which project approvals or operating conditions remain outstanding. Coordinating these teams early reduces later rework without implying that any individual approval is assured.9 10
Common mistakes to avoid
Calling the IRC a “business licence”.
An IRC is not a catch-all operating licence. It records an investment project. A conditional line of business may require separate permissions or conditions, and an ERC does not displace those requirements.1 2 10
Assuming ERC-first means “start trading”.
The 2026 sequencing rule permits formation before IRC procedures in the circumstances described by Article 19(2), subject to Article 8. It does not approve implementation of an IRC-required project or erase the market-access analysis.1 10
Copying a business scope from an unrelated company.
The exact activity, business model, location and investor can change the analysis. Generic categories can conceal a regulated element, an ownership condition or a licence that affects the plan.1 2
Using a nominee arrangement to get past a restriction.
The 2026 enterprise-registration explanation states that owners, members and shareholders must not stand in another person’s name to contribute capital. Use transparent, supportable ownership information instead of a shortcut.4 6 7
Treating a portal receipt as the end of diligence.
Electronic filing can streamline submission, but accuracy, document availability, authority review, bank requirements and post-registration compliance remain separate workstreams.5 6 7 9
Moving funds without aligning the bank process.
Circular 38/2026/TT-NHNN places weight on truthful transaction declarations and supporting documents. Confirm the current licensed-bank requirements before a capital or investment-related transfer.9
Need a case-specific sequence for your activity and location? Explore company setup support from VietPard.
Frequently asked questions about IRC vs ERC in Vietnam
What is an IRC in Vietnam?
An IRC is an Investment Registration Certificate. It is the project-facing registration record used in the investment framework. In practical terms, it records key characteristics of an investment project, such as its objective, scale, location, capital and schedule. Its relevance and the required route depend on the project and investor facts. It should not be treated as a substitute for separate operating licences or conditions that may apply to a business activity.1 2 10
What is an ERC in Vietnam?
An ERC is an Enterprise Registration Certificate. It establishes the registered legal identity of an enterprise and records core enterprise particulars. It is therefore fundamental to company formation and governance. However, receiving an ERC does not itself prove that a foreign investor has cleared project-specific market-access, investment-policy, site or sectoral requirements. The enterprise and the project should be planned as related but distinct workstreams.3 5 10
Do foreign investors need both an IRC and ERC in Vietnam?
They may need both because the documents have different legal jobs. Article 26 of Law No. 143/2025/QH15 identifies foreign-investor investment projects among the projects requiring IRC procedures, while enterprise registration remains relevant for establishing the company. There are statutory exceptions and transaction-specific considerations, so the conclusion should be confirmed against the investment form, activity, ownership structure, location and current implementing rules.1 2 5
Can a foreign investor obtain an ERC before an IRC?
Since 1 March 2026, Article 19(2) allows a foreign investor to establish an economic organisation to implement an investment project before IRC grant or adjustment procedures, subject to foreign-investor market-access conditions. This is not a universal instruction to file ERC first. The investor should first assess whether the project has market-access, location, policy or sectoral exposure and whether early formation has a genuine preparatory purpose.1 2 10
Can a company operate immediately after receiving an ERC?
Not necessarily. Enterprise registration is not a blanket authorisation to implement an IRC-required project or operate a conditional business line. The correct answer depends on the specific activity, project, location and outstanding requirements. Investors should distinguish between forming the company, carrying out permitted preparatory work and commencing the operating activity. Confirm the current authority and sectoral requirements before commitments or launch activity.1 2 10
Conclusion: sequence the work, not just the certificates
The durable answer to IRC vs ERC Vietnam is that an IRC documents the investment project and an ERC creates the enterprise identity. The 2026 framework adds flexibility by permitting company establishment before IRC procedures in the Article 19(2) context, but it keeps market-access and project requirements in place. Start with exact activities, investor and ownership facts, location and operating plan. Then select a sequence that leaves no critical approval assumed. This article is general information only; verify the current requirements for the particular transaction before filing, funding or operating.1 2 9 10
A practical roadmap should also state what is known, what is awaiting confirmation and what cannot start until a condition is met. Keep the project description stable across investor resolutions, enterprise filings, investment submissions and bank discussions. If the commercial plan changes, assess whether the IRC, ERC, a sectoral permission, the account documentation or more than one record needs to change before acting. This disciplined approach is more useful than asking which certificate is better: the appropriate document and order follow the investment facts and the applicable authority process.1 5 6 9
Related editorial opportunities after publication: Register a Company in Vietnam | Vietnam Company Registration Timeline | Foreign Ownership Restrictions in Vietnam.
Sources and Further Reading
All sources were accessed or re-verified on 10 September 2026. Tier 1 Vietnamese sources are the core authority. Where an English reference reproduction is used, the Vietnamese official text controls.
[1] National Assembly / Government Portal. “Law on Investment No. 143/2025/QH15.” Issued 11 December 2025; effective 1 March 2026. T1. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
[2] Government of Vietnam. “Decree No. 96/2026/ND-CP, detailing and guiding the Law on Investment.” Issued and effective 31 March 2026. T1. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
[3] National Assembly / Government Portal. “Law on Enterprises No. 59/2020/QH14.” Issued 17 June 2020; effective 1 January 2021; amended. T1. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
[4] National Assembly / Government Portal. “Law No. 76/2025/QH15 amending the Law on Enterprises.” Issued 17 June 2025; effective 1 July 2025. T1. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
[5] Government of Vietnam. “Decree No. 168/2025/ND-CP on enterprise registration.” Issued 30 June 2025; effective 1 July 2025; amended. T1. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
[6] Government of Vietnam. “Decree No. 296/2026/ND-CP amending Decree 168/2025/ND-CP.” Issued and effective 23 July 2026. T1. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
[7] Government News / Government Portal. “How does online enterprise registration work?.” Published 24 July 2026. T1. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
[8] National Business Registration Portal. “Official National Business Registration Portal.” Accessed 10 September 2026. T1. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
[9] State Bank of Vietnam. “Circular No. 38/2026/TT-NHNN on foreign exchange management of foreign investment activities.” Issued 31 July 2026; effective 18 August 2026. T1 reference translation; Vietnamese text controls. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
[10] Ho Chi Minh City Investment and Trade Promotion Centre (ITPC). “Which investing structure should foreign investors choose?.” Accessed 10 September 2026. T1 official local investment-promotion context. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
[11] KPMG Vietnam. “Decree 296 on enterprise registration.” Published 7 August 2026. T3 cross-check. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
[12] VietPard. “Vietnam Company Setup Services.” Live page verified 10 September 2026. Brand / CTA only. Source link. Accessed 10 September 2026.
Frequently asked questions
What is an IRC in Vietnam?
An IRC is an Investment Registration Certificate. It is the project-facing registration record used in the investment framework. In practical terms, it records key characteristics of an investment project, such as its objective, scale, location, capital and schedule. Its relevance and the required route depend on the project and investor facts. It should not be treated as a substitute for separate operating licences or conditions that may apply to a business activity.1 2 10
What is an ERC in Vietnam?
An ERC is an Enterprise Registration Certificate. It establishes the registered legal identity of an enterprise and records core enterprise particulars. It is therefore fundamental to company formation and governance. However, receiving an ERC does not itself prove that a foreign investor has cleared project-specific market-access, investment-policy, site or sectoral requirements. The enterprise and the project should be planned as related but distinct workstreams.3 5 10
Do foreign investors need both an IRC and ERC in Vietnam?
They may need both because the documents have different legal jobs. Article 26 of Law No. 143/2025/QH15 identifies foreign-investor investment projects among the projects requiring IRC procedures, while enterprise registration remains relevant for establishing the company. There are statutory exceptions and transaction-specific considerations, so the conclusion should be confirmed against the investment form, activity, ownership structure, location and current implementing rules.1 2 5
Can a foreign investor obtain an ERC before an IRC?
Since 1 March 2026, Article 19(2) allows a foreign investor to establish an economic organisation to implement an investment project before IRC grant or adjustment procedures, subject to foreign-investor market-access conditions. This is not a universal instruction to file ERC first. The investor should first assess whether the project has market-access, location, policy or sectoral exposure and whether early formation has a genuine preparatory purpose.1 2 10
Ready to discuss your Vietnam plans?
Discuss your Vietnam market-entry plans with our team.
Speak with Vietpard